Publications
Reliability and relationships between plantar flexor musculotendinous unit assessments: Ultrasonography, myotonography, and isometric strength
Authors: Ecaterina Vasenina 1, David H. Fukuda 2, Jack J. Livingston 2, Ashley A. Herda 3, 4, Colby L. Mangum 5, Jeffrey R. Stout 2
Affiliations:
- Human Performance Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Human Performance, The University of Tampa, Tampa, USA
- Physiology of Work and Exercise Response (POWER) Laboratory, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
- Department of Health, Sport, and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas Edwards Campus, Overland Park, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA
- REehabilitation, Athletic Assessment, & DYnamic Imaging (READY) Laboratory, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
Journal: Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal - March 2026, Volume 16, Issue 1 (DOI: 10.32098/mltj_2026_6512)
-
Field & Applications:
- Reliability
Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of gastrocnemius muscle thickness and stiffness measurements, maximal isometric force using seated and standing plantar flexion, and Achilles tendon length, thickness, and stiffness. Additionally, we aimed to assess the correlations between musculotendinous unit properties and unilateral isometric force assessments of the plantar flexor muscles.
Methods: Twenty physically active males (23.79 ± 3.64 years, 175.56 ± 9.63 cm, and 83.41 ± 16.09 kg) completed the study. Participants underwent anthropometric assessments, ultrasound imaging for gastrocnemius muscle thickness and Achilles tendon properties, and myotonography for mechanical tissue characteristics. Unilateral standing and seated isometric plantar flexion tests were conducted using a force plate. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,k) and coefficients of variation (CV). Stepwise regression assessed relationships between musculotendinous properties and isometric peak force.
Results: Achilles tendon length, calf muscle thickness, and calf circumference exhibited excellent reliability (ICC >0.9), while Achilles tendon thickness (ICC = 0.89), calf echo intensity (ICC = 0.83), and seated isometric peak force (ICC = 0.93) demonstrated good reliability. Standing isometric peak force (ICC = 0.83) also showed good reliability, while calf stiffness (ICC = 0.96), calf frequency (ICC = 0.97), and Achilles tendon stiffness (ICC = 0.78) exhibited good to excellent reliability. Calf decrement correlated with standing peak force (R2 = 0.23, p = 0.018), while Achilles decrement was associated with gastrocnemius muscle thickness (R2 = 0.374, p = 0.004).
Conclusion: Achilles tendon length, gastrocnemius muscle thickness, and stiffness are reliable for plantar flexor assessment. Relationships between muscle-tendon properties and force production highlight their structural influence. Standardized protocols are recommended for improved consistency.
Keywords: plantar flexor, muscle thickness, Achilles tendon, reliability, isometric force
This study supports the use of Achilles tendon length, calf muscle thickness, calf circumference, and certain calf mechanical properties, such as frequency and stiffness, as reliable measures for assessing the plantar flexors muscles. Standing isometric peak force showed good reliability, while seated isometric peak force exhibited higher variability, likely due to differing stabilization demands and participant familiarity with the assessments. The identified relationships between muscle-tendon unit size and mechanical properties suggest that specific muscle and tendon characteristics may differentially impact force production and structural adaptation.
These findings contribute to the existing literature by identifying reliable assessment methods for the plantar flexor musculotendinous unit. Practitioners and researchers should consider using measures that demonstrated good to excellent reliability, such as Achilles tendon length, calf muscle thickness, calf circumference, and mechanical properties like stiffness and frequency, in their evaluations. Caution is advised when interpreting measurements with higher variability, such as Achilles tendon echo intensity and decrement. Standardized protocols, detailed instructions, and enhanced participant familiarization with isometric assessments are recommended to improve measurement consistency.