Publications

Back
April 2026

Effects of Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Stage-Based Lower Limb Motor Recovery and Muscle Tone in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Yoo Kyeong Han 1, Kyung Han Kim 1, Jung Eun Son 1, Arum Jeon 1, Hyo Been Lee 2, Miae Lee 1, Seong Gue Noh 1, Eo Jin Park 1, Seung Ah Lee 1, Sung Joon Chung 1, Dong Hwan Kim 1, Seung Don Yoo 1

Affiliations:

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea
  2. Healthcare Big-Data Center, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea

Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine - March 2026, Volume 15, Issue 7, Article no. 2514 (DOI: 10.3390/jcm15072514)

Background/Objectives: Abnormal muscle tone and impaired motor control commonly limit gait recovery after stroke. Robot-assisted gait training has been introduced to augment conventional rehabilitation; however, its effects on stage-based motor recovery, functional ambulation, and muscle tone during the subacute phase remain unclear.

Methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled 30 patients with subacute stroke who received robot-assisted gait training plus conventional rehabilitation (R-BoT Plus group, n = 15) or conventional rehabilitation alone (control group, n = 15) over 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in Brunnstrom recovery stage of the lower extremities (BRS-LE). Secondary outcomes included Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), Fugl–Meyer Assessment for the Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), clinical spasticity measures (Modified Ashworth Scale and Modified Tardieu Scale), and muscle mechanical properties (MyotonPRO). Exploratory analyses were conducted to examine the associations between changes in stage-based motor recovery (ΔBRS-LE), functional ambulation (ΔFAC), and MyotonPRO parameters. Within-group changes were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Between-group effects were primarily evaluated using baseline-adjusted ANCOVA with HC3 robust standard errors, with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests on change scores as sensitivity analyses. Associations between changes in clinical outcomes and MyotonPRO parameters were evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ).

Results: BRS-LE (p = 0.014) and functional ambulation (p = 0.041) were significantly improved in the R-BoT Plus group. Changes in FMA-LE and clinical spasticity measures did not differ significantly between groups. Quantitative myotonometry revealed selective muscle- and parameter-specific changes. No robust correlations were observed between MyotonPRO parameters and changes in BRS-LE.

Conclusions: The addition of robot-assisted gait training to conventional rehabilitation was associated with greater improvements in stage-based lower-limb motor recovery and functional ambulation in patients with subacute stroke. In contrast, cumulative impairment scores and conventional clinical spasticity measures demonstrated limited changes between groups. Quantitative muscle mechanical assessment revealed selective muscle-specific adaptations, supporting its role as a complementary tool for mechanistic characterization rather than as a surrogate marker of motor recovery. Future studies incorporating dose-matched designs and longer follow-up periods are warranted to clarify the independent and long-term effects of robot-assisted gait training.

 

Keywords: subacute stroke, robot-assisted gait training, R-BoT Plus, Brunnstrom recovery stage, functional ambulation category, muscle tone, spasticity, MyotonPRO, stroke rehabilitation

In patients with subacute stroke, the addition of robot-assisted gait training to conventional rehabilitation resulted in greater improvements in stage-based lower-limb motor recovery and functional ambulation. The observed improvement in BRS-LE suggests enhanced motor coordination and reorganization during the subacute phase. In contrast, cumulative impairment scores and conventional spasticity measures showed limited between-group differences. Quantitative myotonometry revealed selective, muscle-specific changes, supporting its role as a complementary tool for mechanistic assessment rather than a surrogate marker of motor recovery.

Future studies incorporating dose-matched designs and longer follow-up periods are warranted to clarify the independent and long-term effects of robot-assisted gait training.

Back